Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

How much of a fee earner's day is actually billable? The numbers are uncomfortable.

Updated
5 min read
How much of a fee earner's day is actually billable? The numbers are uncomfortable.

Ask a fee earner how their day went and they'll say busy. Ask them how many of those hours were billable and the answer changes tone.

In most small to mid-size UK law firms, fee earners lose somewhere between ninety minutes and two hours every day to work that cannot be charged to a client. Not because they're inefficient. Because the work genuinely needs to happen and nobody else is doing it.

Client update emails. Chasing ID and outstanding documents. Drafting standard letters that are 80 percent identical to the one drafted last week. Taking calls from clients who want to know if anything has changed since Tuesday. Onboarding new matters from scratch when the information gathering alone takes three separate touchpoints.

None of this is billable. All of it takes time. And at a charge-out rate of anywhere between £150 and £400 an hour depending on seniority, the financial cost to the practice isn't abstract.


Do the arithmetic on a four-fee-earner firm. If each person loses ninety minutes a day to non-billable admin which is a conservative estimate, that's six hours of lost billable time daily. Across a five-day week, twenty-four billable hours. Across a year, over a thousand hours of fee-earning capacity that evaporated into update emails and document chasing.

At £200 an hour, that's £200,000 of capacity consumed by administration.

Not all of it is recoverable as some client contact is inherently non-billable and that's right. But a meaningful portion of it is work that doesn't require a fee earner to perform it. It requires someone or something to perform it accurately, consistently, and without taking up space in a qualified lawyer's day.


Break down where the time actually goes.

Client update emails account for roughly forty minutes per fee earner per day in the firms we see. These are emails explaining that the other side's solicitor hasn't responded yet, that the valuation has been booked, that exchange is likely next week. They're necessary. Clients deserve to be kept informed. But the information exists in the case management system already. Writing the email is an act of translation, it’s basically taking what the system knows and putting it into words that follows a pattern identical to the last fifty times it was done.

Chasing ID and documents takes another twenty to twenty-five minutes. New clients who haven't sent proof of identity. Existing clients who haven't returned a signed form. The same chase, slightly rephrased, sent to a different person. The follow-up to the chase when nothing arrives.

Standard document drafting, engagement letters, client care letters, standard NDAs for commercial clients, takes thirty to thirty-five minutes that it shouldn't. These documents have templates. The templates have blanks. Filling the blanks and formatting the output is not what a solicitor trained for.

New matter onboarding adds another twenty minutes. Capturing information across multiple formats, logging it into the case management system, setting up the file. Necessary, repetitive, unskilled.

That's two hours. Gone before lunch, before the legal work starts.


The practices beginning to address this aren't replacing fee earners with technology. They're removing the administrative layer that sits underneath fee earner work and shouldn't require fee earner time.

Client updates can be triggered automatically when a case milestone is reached. The information in the case management system generates a message, it’s reviewed or sent automatically depending on the matter type without anyone having to write it. Clients stay informed. Inbound calls reduce. Fee earners stay focused on the work they're actually there to do.

Document chasing runs on sequences. New client hasn't sent ID? A request goes out automatically at the right time, followed by a reminder, followed by an escalation if nothing arrives. The fee earner is notified when the document lands, not before.

Standard documents don't start from scratch. Matter data populates a template. The fee earner reviews and approves. Ten minutes instead of thirty-five.

New matter onboarding moves from a multi-touchpoint manual process to a single workflow that collects everything, ID, engagement letter sign-off, conflict check inputs, direct debit if relevant and routes it correctly without anyone orchestrating it.


None of this solves the hard parts of legal work. It doesn't help with a complex commercial dispute or a difficult family matter. That's not what it's for.

What it does is give back the two hours that a fee earner currently spends every day doing work that doesn't require their qualifications, their judgement, or their training.

Two hours a day per fee earner. In a practice of four, that's eight hours daily. Enough to take on more cases without hiring. Enough to reduce the pressure that drives good people out of smaller firms towards larger ones that have already automated the tedious parts.

The numbers aren't comfortable to look at. But they're more uncomfortable to ignore.


A free assessment maps exactly where your practice is losing billable hours — delivered in writing within 48 hours, no obligation.

https://switchtoai.ai/

More from this blog

S

SwitchToAI Blog — AI Automation for UK Businesses

12 posts